After retractions of two Covid-19 papers, scientists ask what went wrong

After retractions of two Covid-19 papers, scientists ask what went wrong

4.8
(788)
Write Review
More
$ 28.00
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

With the retractions of two Covid-19 papers from top journals, the scientific community is once again wrestling with the question that arises any time a high-profile publication blows up: Could this have been prevented?

Major medical journals retract Covid-19 studies — MORU Tropical Health Network

Many Covid-19 trial sponsors have failed to report data on other

COVID-19 research update: How many pandemic papers have been published?, News

Gone but Not Forgotten: Retracted COVID-19 Papers Still Cited

Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19: Accountability in Research: Vol 30, No 7

IJERPH, Free Full-Text

Author initiates “a legal process” against a journal and its publisher after a retraction, expressions of concern – Retraction Watch

What's Wrong With Peer Review? - WSJ

Retraction Watch

Bad news for Paxlovid? Coronavirus can find multiple ways to evade COVID-19 drug, Science

Covid-19: Lancet retracts paper that halted hydroxychloroquine trials, Coronavirus

COVID-19 misinformation - Wikipedia

Facing a broken mental health system, many teens fall off a 'cliff

High-profile coronavirus retractions raise concerns about data oversight