Judge Rules Pom Wonderful's Advertising Is Misleading - The New York Times

Judge Rules Pom Wonderful's Advertising Is Misleading - The New York Times

4.6
(207)
Write Review
More
$ 19.00
Add to Cart
In stock
Description

Misleading Advertising Of Trademarks And Consumer Rights

Supreme Court Holds that Competitors May Bring False Advertising Claims Challenging Food and Beverage Labels Regulated by the FDA - Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP

POM Wonderful False Advertising - Judge Rules POM Cease and Desist

Welch's to pay $30m over misleading juice claims

Now POM Wonderful Is Advertising Its Loss to the FTC

State's high court OKs new rules to help root out misleading attorney ads

POM Wonderful Wins A Round In Food Fight With Coca-Cola : The Salt : NPR

Attorney: FTC POM Wonderful ruling is 'abusive' and 'unlawful

The Lanham Act and POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca Cola: A Cause of Action for Competitors — The Antitrust Attorney Blog — June 20, 2014

FTC Upholds Decision Against POM Wonderful on Deceptive Health Claims

Kona Coffee Lawsuit: How Science Helped Farmers Look for Counterfeit Beans - The New York Times

POM's Pomegranate Wars - Truth in Advertising